![]() ![]() Schedule differences, response topography, order of conditions and the length of each phase were not sufficient to account for these results.Waves Plugins Crackis rich featuring 64-bit support, faster scanning, faster loading, and faster processing, Waves opens up new dimensions of high performance plugin power. ![]() Even though resurgence was not obtained with every pigeon, at least some small-magnitude resurgence occurred in each experiment and was not related systematically to reinforcement rates of alternative responding. In Experiments 5 and 6, differential reinforcement rates were arranged by using fixed-DROs and VIs for pecking a different key, respectively. In Experiment 4, reinforcement rates first were differential and, then, equal to those in the Training phase. In Experiment 3, reinforcers were discontinued before differential reinforcement rates were effected. Response-Elimination phase reinforcement rates were manipulated systematically in subsequent experiments: In Experiment 2, reinforcement rate was equal, in one component, and lower or higher in the other, than in the Training phase. Experiment 1B was a replication of Experiment 1A, but with experimentally-naïve pigeons. More resurgence occurred in the lean component, but this could have resulted from response-rate differences between components in the Training-phase. Reinforcement rates were equal and then, higher in one (rich) component, and lower in the other (lean), than in the Training phase. In the Response-Elimination phase, a variable differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior (DRO) schedule was in effect in each component. In Experiment 1A, key pecking was maintained on a multiple variable-interval (VI) VI schedule in the Training phase. The effects of reinforcement rate of alternative responding on resurgence were studied in six experiments with pigeons. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |